MYTH No. 2: Nirvana Killed Hair Metal
REALITY: It was already dead. Blame Queensrÿche.
The legend of Nirvana has always demanded that the band be viewed as a sea change in popular taste -- the meaningless but oft-rehashed factoid that Nevermind knocked Michael Jackson's Dangerous off the top spot on the album chart, as if sales turnover didn't exist until Kurt Cobain came along.
But the most enduring fable has always been the one about how Nirvana, and grunge in general, rid the world of foofy coiffures and pink guitars and power ballads overnight.
By the time Nevermind charted in October 1991, hair metal was already long on the way out.
Glam poodles had wiped off their mascara and were trying to get serious -- Cinderella's 1990 Heartbreak Station was a purist blues-rock record; Skid Row's Slave to the Grind, out in June 1991, was pop-shunning arena turbulence that went to No. 1 without a hit single.
16 ROCK MYTHS DEBUNKED:
1. Radiohead
2. Nirvana
3. Lady Gaga
4. Biggie & Tupac
5. Marilyn Manson
6. Emo Oversharers
>> Gallery: 10 More Rock Myths
>> Click Here For Full Coverage
A certain kind of boogie-based hard rock had also been on the way back ever since Guns N' Roses and the Cult broke through circa '88; Black Crowes' debut album reached No. 4 in 1990.
By the turn of the decade, even the breakthrough metal-leaning acts had a pronounced boho bent: Living Colour, black Manhattanites led by their slumming avant-jazz guitarist; St. Augustine–quoting Houston eggheadbangers King's X, led by their black gay Christian bassist; proggish San Francisco reformed rap-punks Faith No More. And maybe most significantly, given the emerging Lollapalooza Decade, new-age L.A. sideshow beatniks Jane's Addiction, whose Ritual de lo Habitual went Top 20 in 1990.
One of the biggest rock hits the year before "Smells Like Teen Spirit" even came from Seattle—namely, Queensryche's "Silent Lucidity," a Pink Floyd pastiche by thinkers-of-big-thoughts more given to high-flown concept albums about technological conspiracy than lowbrow groupie gropes.
So what changed after Nirvana, exactly? Well, the haircuts, maybe. And within a couple years, radio and MTV were overrun by such innovative new bands as Collective Soul, Candlebox, Live, and Silverchair. The more things change…
Agree? Disagree? Tell us what you think below!
- Posted By Anonymous
01.21.10 8:03 PM
I would have to agree that hair metal had declined in popularity by 1991, but it wasn't really "dying." Even though I was only 10 in 1991, I remember cheesy hair bands like Extreme, Firehouse and Mr. Big still being quite popular, and Ugly Kid Joe (that band who sang "Everything About You") was even popular a year later. But I still think that hair bands could have died when they did anyway, which I'd say was really more like 1992, even if Nirvana hadn't gotten big. That's just how the music industry works; styles die out. Nirvana just came along at the right time, and you never know, there was the possibility that hair bands could have stuck around even with the popularity of grunge taking off and making alternative rock in general more popular. People also might bring up that alternative rock bands like U2, REM, Depeche Mode, Jane's Addiction, Alice in Chains, Red Hot Chili Peppers, The Cure, Faith No More, Living Colour, etc. were around before Nirvana, and also even had hits on the radio and MTV before Nirvana made it big. However, during that time in the 80's and early-early 90's, the hair bands were still the dominant, most popular form of rock around. Nothing could kill them off then. People praise Nirvana because the hair bands just really started to die off once they became popular. And as for people saying that grunge ended when Kurt ended himself in April of '94, if I remeber right, Pearl Jam's Vitalogy, released in late 1994, was a huge hit (as well as Nirvana's Unplugged in New York), and Soundgarden, Stone Temple Pilots (who some might classify as post-grunge), Alice in Chains and Screaming Trees still had popular singles and videos on alternative rock radio and MTV a year or two after that. I'd say grunge really died in 1997 after the breakup of Soundgarden, and by that time, a slew of happy pop-rock, ska, pop-punk, and really crappy post-grunge bands had taken over alternative rock radio and MTV.
- Posted By BillyBreathesJF
01.12.10 12:42 AM
It looks funny when someone defies a thought taken for the last 15 years, people think that Nirvana killed hair metal, that is one of the reasons why Nirvana is so mitified as rock gods who built their tribute ststue with Teen spirit. As previously said it is funny that all nirvana fans **** on their pants when their "gods" are doubted. Nirvana actually didn't do much, they might have made the change apparentely but the change was already made, bands like sonic youth had already been recognized by rock critics, even Daydream nation was featured on the greatest ablums of thedecade of the RS magazine; R.E.M. had already broke into mainstream succsess throughout the late 80's and had critical success with their albums specially with Document & Murmur who reached top 10 in the greatest albums of the 80's by RS magazine. Jane's addiction's second album "Nothing's Shocking" sold 3 million copies in 88, then in the early nineties Soundgarden had their breakthrough album "badmotorfinger" in 91, the black crows "Shake your moneymaker" went 4 times platinum, Jane's addiction's Ritual sold 4 million copies gaining them more reputation; "Gish" Smashing Pumpkins debut album sold 1 million copies and was produced by Butch Vig (the same guy who produced nevermind) months before. Pearl jam who were criticized by music critics (you can count on that SPIN & RS) by being a complete unlegit copy of nevermind who were trying to steal money from young grunge kids (meaning that they suddenly became jealous because Ten outsold Nevermind by 3 million copies) turned out to be more experienced and more legit than nirvana, when kurt was listening and just discovering grunge, Jeff ament & stone gossard were playing in Mother love bone, who was one of the pioneers of grunge, Eddie vedder, mike mccready, stone & jeff played on Temple of the dog, a band who was made in honor of the passing of Andrew wood. the lead vocalist of mother love bone. Alice in chains took the world by the ears when Man in the box became a hit, earlier tan teen spirit. What nirvana did was that they went pop after critizing R.E.M. for being sellouts and critizing Pearl jam as being a copy of themselves. The hit the mainstream no 1 and then did nothing else, noe of their singles like come as you are or in bloom o lithium had that impact. so please do not say stupid things about pearl jam, they are the true legends, when you do something that stands up and then disappear dramatically meaning that you will not be able to screw thing in the afterlife, just be remebered for that one hit. After all, I Start to think that Kurt killing himself being 27 years old was just a publicity stunt to concide with Janis, jimi & Jim, well siucidal is not equal to natural death, that is why he is not as great as them, he didn't even liked who he was or what he did, just what others did, and was "great" critizicing everybody else after him. Accept it, Kurt is no hero, or savior, he was just in the right place at the right time, just months after more than a Dozen acts had done the dirty work for him, he just pushed the lighter onto the powder Keg and took credit for it
whoever reads this, Thnks
JFG
- Posted By Kevinman
01.08.10 7:40 PM
I am not going to lie and say that I was listening to Nirvana before they were big, or that I was a fan of Mother Love Bone and Alice in Chains first. The fact is that my first tape was Born in the USA, and after that I got some NWA and Eazy-E tapes from a friend(around 6th grade). Then around the same time I started listening to Metallica, thought they were great, but something was still missing. Then about the end of 8th grade(May 92), I heard this "new" band Nirvana. I got my first cd player for graduation and the cd that changed my life, Nevermind. I realized that there was music out there that I understood, and it seemed it understood me. This opened me up to a world of other artists that otherwise I may not have been exposed to for quite some time to come. I remember being glad the hair band days were over, because I thought it all sounded the same, Poison, Def Leopard, etc. I know if you're a fan of these bands you disagree and I understand that, as people say this about the music I listen to. To sum it all up, I owe Nirvana for letting me expand my musical horizon and listening to different bands with different styles and taking what I like from each.
After all, I am a die hard Pearl Jam fan, but liked Nirvana first. However when Ten came out Nirvana quickly took a second seat.
Thanks,
Kevin
- Posted By Anonymous
01.04.10 12:35 AM
NWA's Straight Outta Compton came out in 1988, which helps reinforce the story that Nirvana wasn't the killer of hair bands. Soundgarden was well-established before Nirvana but wasn't pop radio-friendly (can't get "Big Dumb Sex" on the air in Peoria, don't you know). Nirvana was a great band but was a beneficiary of being in the right place at the right time. NWA was rewriting the rules of Gangsta Rap long before Nirvana was making it OK to wear flannel shirts.
- Posted By Peeonmyface
12.10.09 8:42 PM
Wow. Nirvana fanboys really get their panties in a bunch whenever someone questions their sacred Kurdt.
- Posted By Rodney P. Anonymous
12.09.09 1:54 AM
I believe that hair metal was dying (as it should have from the begining) Nirvana was just simply the final nail in the coffin. They're the band that made it okay to flood the public with the great bands that only had hits every no wand then before. The 60s and the 90s were the best decades for music.
- Posted By kitty_galore
12.08.09 1:44 PM
What killed hair metal: The cover of the Pretty Boy Floyd "Leather Boyz With Electric Toyz" CD.
Visit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sikworld/3770145200
- Posted By Anonymous
12.07.09 5:14 PM
soundgarden was conforming to the Nirvana age? shows how much you know about the seattle scene.... soundgarden had 2 EPs and 1 full-length out (which was popular enough to have a grammy nomination) before Bleach came out.... looks like we're dealing with another Kurt Superfan, who's completely oblivious to the scores of other bands from that era with the same influences and sound as Nirvana, just their t-shirts are harder to buy. Nirvana was seminal to the commercial environment in the music industry, but to an avid music listener, a decent band from seattle, whose second album was far too 'radio-friendly'- but to you, hooks are what define a good band from a bad band, right?
- Posted By Logan McMillen
12.05.09 4:36 PM
I'm glad that Courtney killing Kurt is no longer considered a myth or legend, just a generally accepted fact
- Posted By Anonymous
12.03.09 8:14 AM
Who remembers Warrant's Cherry Pie video?
That helped kill hair metal.There was already a buzz about northwest bands in 91.
I had friends showing me Soundgarden and Mother Love Bone while I was in Ventura.
When a friend first showed me the Nirvana Nevermind album, it sounded like the rock of the day and felt like Jane's Addiction with a singer that was a cross between Axl and Andrew Wood. That was my first impression...but the album played on with great songs one after the other. This was not the usual rock album. Andthen when the video hit MTV, it LOOKED different. And that was what really made the movement to the style of grunge....clothing style. I moved to Seattle in 92. I could not find one artist or band that would admit to playing "grunge." They all said it was a media invention. They dressed that way because it was comfortable and functional. Docs were necessary to walk through the puddles. Flannel was warm when you needed it. Otherwise, wear it around your waist. So Nirvana proved that they could sell music and give a LOT of people something new to sing. But advertisers turned it into a movement.But, it was Nirvana that got the ball rolling in the biggest way.
- Posted By HS
11.29.09 6:05 PM
Nirvana didn’t kill Hair Bands, they buried them.
The hair band balloon may have been on a slow descent pre Nevermind. However, no one in hair spray heaven expected a naked baby and a dollar bill to pop it, sending wigs, mascara, one armed abusive drummers and all three sides of the story into free fall.
Waiting below, Kurt with a shovel filled with existential anarchic angst, Kirst, a spade of social and musical unrest, and Dave, with both arms, hastily cover a decade of amplified nursery rimes in a newly dug six foot hole of the new grunge era. Fortunately or unfortunately, capitalism was also in attendance and gladly funded the tomb stone.
The new musical reality gives birth to new radio formats, style and substantive music that you cannot get by filling a balloon with hair spray. The musical landscape collapsed into the underground almost overnight.
There may have been small signs of a slow change in music on the way, but Nevermind unexpectedly expedited the rotation in a noisy, dark, chaotic, grungy shove. Never again would we be exposed to Brent Michael's and his wig (another myth?). Oh, wait...DAMN YOU VH1!
- Posted By Sylas M.
11.29.09 5:38 PM
I was 17 in 1991 when I first heard "Teen Spirit" and I remember loving it. It spurred me to go back and rediscover the punk records I had heard from skater friends when I was about 13, start playing and form my own bands.
It's true that the legend had been played up and exagerated over the years but to disavow it completely would be a mistake. Yes, Guns N' Roses started a shift away from Poison, Warrant, etc in terms of what was popular in the mainstream a few years earlier.
However, there was a much more divisive line in the sand with grunge. I remember laughing my ass off when Nirvana appeared on Headbangers Ball. They stuck out like a sore thumb....and lots of metal fans really didn't get the sarcasm. I remember lots of "fag" comments in school directed at Kurt Cobain by metal fans. And Cobain was also one of the first people in a mainstream band on MTV to openly address sexism and homophobia. Might sound silly in 2009 but it set them apart in 1991. That in itself was part of a cultural shift. They didn't invent it and bands with the same values had been underground for years but they helped put that message out into suburban households to kids more accumstomed to lyrics about sex and partying.
Nirvana were part of something bigger...it wasn't just the one band. But yes, in a way they did kill hair metal. Heavier or not, Skid Row was still much closer to the status quo than what came in at the end of '91.
And then of course, it was all ruined in record speed by a lot of watered-down bad alternative music in the span of 5 years. Same thing that happens to everything when there's enough money to be made!
- Posted By theumpteenthtimes
11.28.09 10:38 PM
Dave Grohl Swallows Gum, Looks Less Cool
TUSCON, AZ–In the midst of this past Tuesday’s Foo-Fighters performance at the Tuscon Center of the Performing Arts, frontman, Dave Grohl, accidentally swallowed his gum while singing the chorus to the band’s hit song, “Monkey Wrench.” A look of dismay washed over the audience, as Grohl’s appeal as a rock star quickly vanished, leaving... »
READ MORE at theumpteenthtimes.com/?p=152
"Music NEws That's Fit to Fake"
- Posted By Anonymous
11.28.09 2:30 PM
I think like many movements in music history they all start to fade at some point...BUT...there is no way you can say that Grunge/Nirvana's Nevermind was not the nail in the coffin for Glam type hair metal. Fact is for some trend to fade, another one has to come rushing in. There is never a complete void in the music world. In 1991 two ablums changed the entire music world forver. That was Nevermind and NWA's Straight Out Of Compton!!! Two of the the most influential albums EVER. There are very few times you can pin point a Major change in the music world and these two albums rushed in, in a matter of months, probably 50% of the music you hear today.
- Posted By Rizzi
11.27.09 8:57 PM
I think that we are talking about a sub category of music with in a general genre of music. I think it is safe to say that Hair metal was already DOA by the time Nirvana arrived on the scene. Nirvana was a great band and I hate to say but the record companies jumped on Nirvana as a vehicle to sell records to catch the new movement among young people. There where many bands that paved the way before Nirvana like: the Pixies, Mother Love Bone, and of course Jane's Addiction and GnR. Jane's had many fans i.e metal heads, surfers,skaters, hippies, new wave, punks. Most of these bands all held there creativity prowness before selling out to the record companies. Nirvana also came from an Indie label but the change had already occured young folks and college radio listners already had their ears to the ground. Unfortunately, Nirvana was the by product after the record labels new what they were missing.
- Posted By Sam Rhode
11.27.09 1:49 PM
I disagree. Sure, some of the smaller bands were taking off the make-up, but the music wasn't changing. Cinderella, for example: "Long Cold Winter," the predecessor to "Heartbreak Station," was just as much a straight-ahead blues rock album, only with make-up. And Skid Row? Listen to their first album, and you'll notice they were always noticeably heavier than most of their hair metal counterparts; this gets overlooked because the singles are all the record's remembered for now.
As to the other bands you mentioned, Living Colour and Faith No More, while great and innovative bands, were basically one-hit-wonders for all the impact they had on the pop rock scene at the time. And King's X...man, they didn't even have ONE big hit. And this is coming from a longtime fan who dearly wishes they had.
Your last example was Queensryche, and you're half-right about them: up until the album with Silent Lucidity on it ("Empire"), they had been a proggier, politically bent band. However, "Empire" saw them more or less sell that ideal right the hell out. "Empire" was a super-slick hair metal album, full of cheesy love songs; remember, its other big hit was the straight-up ****-rocker "Jet City Woman." Now, if Quuensryche's commercial breakthrough had happened with their previous album, "Operation: Mindcrime," I'd be more inclined to agree with you, but as it stands, by the time grunge took them down, they had become just another hair metal band.
I should clarify: when I say hair metal, I'm not primarily referencing the look. I'm referencing the sound: the canned distortion of the guitars, the over-the-top solos, the eighth-note basslines, the reverbed-out drums, and the lyrics that pretty much veered from "I'm a big tough male who wants to **** hot chicks!" rockers to "I'm a big sensitive male who loves you (a whole lotta)!" power ballads.
I was in high school and already very musically aware when Nirvana hit, and I can say with confidence that they, along with the other Seattle bigies, did kill hair metal. When bands as big as Motley Crue and Guns N Roses go from top-of-the-heap to irrelevant overnight, that is a sea change. And not only did hair metal go down, the whole metal SCENE went down. Slews of heavier underground acts, like Overkill, Exodus, and Testament were dropped by the majors. Metallica survived by selling THEIR sound out; hell, the only real higher-profile metal bands that came through it with their sounds and fanbases intact were Slayer and Pantera.
You do make a good point that the pop metal scene was already losing steam on its own, but the underground was thriving at that time, and it got smacked down equally hard. People were hungry for something different, and they found it in grunge, albeit for a few short years. So yeah, I'll keep giving Nirvana and the rest of the Seattle Four credit for making most of that happen.
- Posted By Anonymous
11.27.09 10:54 AM
I think that article makes some good points. The hair metal of '90-'91 was vastly different than the hair metal of '86-'89. The reality is that Nirvana were at the right place at the right time. Hair metal was on its last legs by summer of '91. R.E.M. and Janes Addiction are the bands that opened the door for alternative rock and Nirvana walked through in a big way.
And I totally agree that Living Colour, Faith No More and King's X were important bands that I might call "progressive hard rock" that helped steer rock away from the "girls and cars" aesthetic.
- Posted By Terry
11.26.09 9:55 PM
Most of the people posting weren't around when the whole "grunge" thing went down. I was. I was 20 in 1990 in Portland. I got to see alot of these future superbands in clubs, Alice in Chains, Mookey Blaylock (Pearl Jam), Nirvana, Mudhoney and others. At the time people were getting sick of what was considered overproduced "fake" music. I remember being at a party where a buddy was saying Nirvana was too corporate. This movement was all about the disgust of popular culture at the time. And the Nirvana break through did kill hair metal. Hair metal may have been dying but Nirvana finished it off very quickly.
- Posted By Chris Toth
11.26.09 2:09 PM
Metal killed metal when it became engrossed with stadiums and sales. Metallica stayed tru to it's form from the beginning (for the most part) and kept a loyal fan base long after Cobain was dead and buried. Some say it was the lack of silly glam-alike foibles like spandex and neon embraced by even the best bands including Dio. Some say the music stayed fresh and topical. I think it's because they did all things tru to who they were. Fans can smell sellouts a hundred miles away. Bon Jovi started with a hometown Jersey party boy vibe and stayed tru to it (aside from some overly hollywood video like "i'm a cowboy") and to this day can still fill mid size arenas.
The moral here is don't get caught in the trends. Write good lyrics and good music. Stop worrying about getting the private jet and you may last as long as U2.
- Posted By Mattlove1
11.26.09 12:36 PM
It's easy to make a case for something if you grab a handful of annecdotal evidence and ignore the world at large. I am no fan of Nirvana. I loathe Nirvana, they represented a return to absurd rock values that I had hoped were dead and gone. They aimed for a cross between Black Flag and Black Sabbath (a paltry ambition) but they achieved was a recapitulization of Black Oak Arkansas. But it is impossible to ignore (if you live in the real world) that grunge represented ground zero for the innovative, inclusive, musical synth-based styles of the 80s (New Wave, or whatever) Technical guitar playing (Dweezel Zappa even put the instrument down for a while, there was no market for what he was doing) and hair metal, among other things. What followed was gloomy, depressing, and inartuculate. I don't know why you knock Collective Soul, I have liked what little I heard of them. They had good songs that displayed a stylistic range that grunge never achieved. The 17th Rock Myth that the Spin guys forgot to include: the irrelevancy of Spin Magazine to contemporary life. The last time they were relevant was when they covered The Human Skab.
What is happening in music today is everything and nothing. If you are interested in my take on it, check out http://zebratrucks.blogspot.com/. Just remember, you and I and Spin are equally important. There are no ordinary people, and there are no stars.


























01.26.10 6:05 PM
The Fleeting Ends like this