Since the early days of Napster and the first downloaded songs, the music streaming business
has gone a long way. Music sharing became possible thanks to modern technologies like the
internet and quicker download rates.
Regulations and structure have given a method for businesses to monetize digital property
while preserving it and putting new technologies to use since those early days.
A few big platforms burst into the scene as the industry progressed. As customers started to
chuck away their CDs favor media services, these early growth leaders got a big lift.
Those early days, though, have all but come to an end. This isn’t a brand-new technology.
The industry has started to transform rather than focus on sizable new user acquisitions, and
the evidence is clear.
Timing is Crucial
In terms of time, it’s possible that musicians – and any other artists who want to accept crypto
instead of dollars (or other hard currencies) sent straight into their accounts – are playing a
waiting game. To put it another system, these people are placing an implicit wager.
The wager is that by hanging on to the ethereum, whether bitcoin or another cryptocurrency,
they will be able to wait for the price to climb, convert the cryptocurrency to fiat at a
favorable rate, and then spend the money. This also indicates that individuals have sufficient
spare money to deposit in the exchange's accounts and play the waiting game.
The converse is also true: the value of the crypto assets might plummet, causing the musician
or artist's account to lose a significant amount of money. To be sure, it's a dangerous venture.
It is worth remembering that before investing in any cryptocurrency, it is a good idea to learn
the basics and see how this world works. This can be done on sites such as
https://cryptomeister.com, which educate and explain topics related to cryptocurrencies.
The Old System
Furthermore, the same feature that made streaming music so groundbreaking in the first place
may be contributing to the problem. The internet changed the music industry, but it is also a
demanding boss, and new technologies make the competition more challenging.
One such example is Bitcoin, the tech world's newest darling, based on distributed ledger
technology. It’s been utilized in peer-to-peer networks that let artists sell their music directly
to fans. DLT is similar to Airbnb for living spaces in that it enables consumers to interact
directly with their favorite artists and purchase and play their music without the need for a
According to current figures, artists only received 12% of overall income from older-model
streaming platforms. The centralized businesses that grab revenues from creators are no
longer present in this new economy.
Familiarity may help people feel more confident about using cryptos in familiar situations.
According to recent PYMNTS data, 18 percent of the adult population — 46 million
customers, including 17 million non-owners — is likely to utilize cryptocurrencies to make a
Challenging the System
DLT offers the prospect of skipping much of the profit-taking, which has artists and fans
interested in how it can change the industry. JAM, for example, enables musicians to get
compensated for every second of music played on the internet.
Artists are paid in minutes rather than months or years as they were in the past utilizing
Surprisingly, this strategy is also advantageous to those who are listening. Because there are
no membership fees, add-ons, or commitments, listeners may obtain more music for their
money by using the service.
The future is here.
Others may say that there is no such thing as a win-win situation in complicated sectors like
music, technology developments are always making inroads into numerous industries. The
music streaming business may be irrevocably changed as a result of bitcoin.
Cryptocurrency may become the excellent market-mover for future listening options, much as
Napster transformed the music industry. The future may be here, with reduced pricing,
greater access, and happy artists.