Skip to content
Death and Taxes

Don Jr.’s Idiocy May Have Saved Him From Getting Arrested in Russia Probe

BOZEMAN,MT-SEPTEMBER,25: Donald Trump,Jr. speaks at a campaign rally in support Montana Senate candidate Matt Rosendale in Bozeman, MT on September 25,2018. Rosendale is running against incumbent Democrat Senator Jon Tester in the 2018 midterm elections. (Photo by William Campbell-Corbis via Getty Images)

Back in July, long before today’s release of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, the world learned that Donald Trump Jr. had arranged a meeting with a Kremlin-linked Russian government official to receive documents supposedly containing dirt on Hillary Clinton for use in the Trump campaign. Plenty of experts believed that this constituted a violation of campaign finance laws against soliciting contributions from foreign nationals, but neither Trump nor his fellow meeting-attender Jared Kushner ever faced criminal action. (Paul Manafort, who was also there, was arrested and convicted, but not for this.) Why not? The Mueller report provides a pretty hilarious answer:

“The office did not obtain admissible evidence likely to meet the government’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that these individuals acted ‘willfully,’ i.e., with general knowledge of the illegality of their conduct,” it reads in part. In other words, because they may have been too dense to understand that what they were doing was against the law, we can’t charge them with a crime.

You may be wondering why this line of argument didn’t work for you, when you told that jerkoff cop you thought it was perfectly legal to run through the streets fully nude with a trash bag full of cocaine. Since when does ignorance of the rules a valid defense for breaking them?

It seems that this is a particularity of campaign finance law. The American Bar Association, in a blog post about campaign finance, explains that “All criminal violations of federal campaign finance laws require proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the violator acted knowingly and willfully in violation of the laws, which means that the violator knew what the law required or prohibited but acted contrary to the law.” Similarly, an attorney and expert on the subject told Time last year that “The difference between a campaign finance violation that is a crime and a campaign finance violation is a civil matter is whether the action was taking knowingly and willfully.”

Lucky Don Jr.: saved by his own idiocy.